126k views
4 votes
What can be said of the Union army during the brutal Wilderness Campaign?

a) It ran short of troops to continue on to Richmond.
B) Badly needed supplies and munitions arrived often.
C) It got too far ahead of its main supply depots.
D) Plenty of fresh soldiers kept the army strong.

2 Answers

4 votes

"It ran short of troops to continue on to Richmond" can be said of the Union army during the brutal Wilderness Campaign.

Answer: Option A

Step-by-step explanation:

Tactically the regular army was defeated in each major battle and engagement within the brutal campaign. However rather than receding back to Washington once a defeat General Grant and therefore the regular army unbroken pressing on south and eastward. This force Lee and therefore the Army of North Virginia to get back the south and west to dam the regular army from reaching Richmond.

Though the regular army lost a lot of men in each battle the regular army may afford the loses, whereas the military of North Virginia couldn't survive the loss of men and material. Strategically the South was losing the war, whereas the Union was losing the battles.

User Vikalp
by
5.9k points
7 votes

Answer:

D) Plenty of fresh soldiers kept the army strong.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Union Army had more soldiers than the confederate army. This helped the Union to kept going even if the majority of the battles were lost. In the aftermath the Union had more casualties than the confederates but as the army of the Union was greater than the percentage damage over the confederates was greater.

User Itchydon
by
5.0k points