108k views
0 votes
How might a news source's coverage of a presidential speech provide less accurate information than a personal reading of the speech's transcript?

2 Answers

5 votes

News sources are heavily subjected to bias. If you read the transcript, you are free to make your own interpretations. But if you read the news coverage, you must listen to their interpretations. There are times when you mught want to do this, such as if you want to gauge political opinion/stance and see people's reactions, but if you want to form your own, you should read the source. It's kind of like reading a review of a movie. It gives a good and accurate summary, and takes way less time than watching the film, but you're missing out on a huge part of the experience if you only read the review

User Foal
by
6.7k points
4 votes

Answer:

The correct answer is that The news source's coverage would have bias whether intentional or not. Unless the news presented the entire speech without commentary, the news source would have to make relatively biased decisions about which part of the speech to show and which parts to not show.

Step-by-step explanation:

usatestprep answer and explanation

User Dhafin Rayhan
by
6.5k points