104k views
5 votes
In the section "Facts v. Interpretation," how does Mr. Kurland compare non-critical readers with critical readers?

User SamGoody
by
4.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Mr. Kurland compares the critical and non-critical readers with some characterizes. First, the non-critical reader doesn’t know how to read a text, the lecture of it is simple and go to the point, for example: rewrite the answer for a question with no double-check, they only memorize words. On the other hand, the critical readers have a lecture of the document deeper, they identify what the text is saying and the position of the author, if they understand that, they can argue and form a critical opinion.

User Maurizio Reginelli
by
4.5k points