178k views
2 votes
A consumers’ advocate group would like to evaluate the average energy efficiency (EER) of window mounted, large-capacity air conditioning units. A random sample of 36 units is selected and tested for a fixed period of time. Their EER records are as follows: 8.9 9.1 9.2 9.1 8.4 9.5 9.0 9.6 9.3 9.3 8.9 9.7 8.7 9.4 8.5 8.9 8.4 9.5 9.39.3 8.8 9.4 8.9 9.3 9.0 9.2 9.1 9.8 9.6 9.3 9.2 9.1 9.6 9.8 9.5 10.0Using the 0.05 level of significance, is there evi- dence that the average EER is different from 9.0?

User Godeke
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer: Yes , there is evidence that the average EER is different from 9.0

Explanation:


\\Summing up the samples given , we have 331.6


\\Therefore , sample mean = 331.6/36


\\≈9.2


\\The standard deviation is ≈ 0.38


\\Since n > 30 , then we use Z- statistics


\\Let
H_(0) : Average EER = 9


\\
H_(1) : Average ≠ 9


\\using the z - formula


\\z =
(x - u)/(s/√(n) )


\\=
(9.2-9)/(0.38/√(36) )


\\= 3. 15


\\Checking the z- value at 0.05 , we have 1.64


\\Conclusion: since the z- calculate value is greater than the z-tab , then we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there the average EER is different from 9

User Tengomucho
by
7.3k points