219k views
0 votes
HELP:

In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford, what was Scott’s claim?

A. That he had been brutally treated by his owner and should be freed.

B. That his time in a free territory meant that he was a free man.

C. That he had been illegally captured in the North because of the Fugitive Slave Act.

D. That the Kansas-Nebraska Act must be repealed.

User GordonW
by
5.9k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

i think its D. That the Kansas-Nebraska Act must be repealed.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Strawtarget
by
4.9k points