Final answer:
Fraud conditions refer to the elements typically present when a fraud occurs - pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. Fraud risk factors are circumstances that raise the potential for fraud, such as management attitudes and ineffective monitoring. The Madoff case involved fraud conditions like the pressure to perform and opportunities from lack of oversight, along with trust and strategy complexity as fraud risk factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
Professional auditing standards differentiate between fraud conditions and fraud risk factors. Fraud conditions, often referred to under the fraud triangle, comprise three elements that are typically present when a financial fraud occurs: pressure or incentive, opportunity, and rationalization. For instance, a person may feel pressured to maintain a certain lifestyle, perceive an opportunity to embezzle funds without detection, and rationalize the fraud as borrowing. On the other hand, fraud risk factors are circumstances that increase the likelihood of fraud occurring, such as management's attitude towards financial reporting, history of violations, or ineffective monitoring.
In the case of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, the fraud conditions present were: the pressure to deliver high returns to investors, the opportunity created by Madoff's control over the investment firm and lack of effective oversight, and his rationalization of the fraud, possibly seeing it as a temporary measure or justified by the returns he had previously generated for clients. Fraud risk factors included Madoff's respected status in the financial community, which created blind trust, and the complexity of the investment strategies he claimed to use, which made the fraud difficult for investors to detect.