Final answer:
The lawyer provokes the banker's bet by challenging his pride or beliefs, similar to the way bank supervisors face political pressure. This kind of provocation can cause defensive decision-making in a confrontation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to a scenario in which the lawyer provokes the banker into making a rash decision regarding a bet. This provocation could involve a challenge to the banker's pride or questioning his belief in certain principles. It is similar to the pressures and controversies that a bank supervisor may face from bank owners and politicians, related to decisions on closing a bank or altering its financial investments. The pressure could come in the form of a direct challenge or an implication that the supervisor's authority or ability is insufficient, thereby provoking a defensive response, much like the lawyer might accomplish with the banker.
The exchange between a lawyer and a character like a banker often involves understanding intricate details and power dynamics that can lead to significant consequences, which mirrors the compounding pressures in a financial or political context. An analogous situation is presented in dramatic literature where characters may confront each other on matters of business or personal interest, using their wits and knowledge to influence or coerce decisions.