PLEASE HELP FAST THIS IS TIMED
Imagine that a piece of art has been critiqued by two different critics. Most of the reviews agree that the work is technically well done and that the artist has successfully conveyed their message. But the first critic just does not like the piece while the second one is very impressed. How should the reader interpret these conflicting reviews?
Since they disagree, neither review is particularly valuable.
The first critic is probably a better judge of the art than the second one.
It is a solid piece of work that appeals to some people more than others.
If it was a really good piece of art, all critics would agree on its meaning.