Answer:
The main difference is the limit of power. Elizabeth was subordinate to the Parliament, and the laws she would approve should be passed by the Parlament's houses. On the other hand, the Pharaoh had the power, he was not subordinated by any law, he was the incarnation of a god. Because of that, what he said was automatically determined as divine, and couldn't be disrespected.
Step-by-step explanation:
A Representative Monarchy. This is the best description of the British Monarchy. The consolidation of mighty power in England occurred relatively early in comparison with its neighbors, especially Germany. The invasion and domain of the territory by the Normands created a noble class submissive to the central power. However, this nobility still had certain powers and they demanded that their rights should be respected. Then the Parlament was created to limit the king's power. In Ancient Egypt, the concept of democracy or representation was not common. Actually, it was completely unknown. That's why the Pharao had the might power under people's life and death.