Answer:
Assessing the Constitution of the Roman Republic and how it was applied in theory and in practice, it becomes clear that the Roman Republic, being constitutionally quite democratic, in practice was a fundamentally undemocratic society dominated by a chosen caste of wealthy aristocrats.
However, the Roman Republic combined aristocratic and democratic features. Compared to Greek democracy, the Roman Republic was a complex system of checks and balances protecting the rights and interests of various categories of citizens. No one in it could completely prevail, as well as fail. Therefore, the ancient Roman republic has demonstrated high stability.
Unlike the Greeks, the Romans recognized the inherent value of the law and the need to protect the rights and interests of every citizen. Thus, Rome understood democracy as the rule of law and procedure.
Step-by-step explanation: