Register
Lawanda just didn't want to change her stance on capital punishment, but Jack's argument did make her think twice about her position. However, instead of being persuaded, Lawanda dismissed the arguments
157k views
2 votes
Lawanda just didn't want to change her stance on capital punishment, but Jack's argument did make her think twice about her position. However, instead of being persuaded, Lawanda dismissed the arguments by deeming Jack's facts unreliable. How has Lawanda responded to her own cognitive dissonance in this instance?

User Vincent Liou
by
6.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

attacking Jack's sources and claiming that they were not credible

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the information provided within this passage it seems that Lawanda responded to her own cognitive dissonance in this instance by attacking Jack's sources and claiming that they were not credible. This was done when she "dismissed the arguments by deeming Jack's facts unreliable." Doing do she is saying that the the information that Jack was given is not legitimate and should be ignored.

User Imjaydeep
by
4.8k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.8m questions

7.5m answers

Other Questions

Which type of anxiety plays a key role in many cases of erectile dysfunction?
Mr. Jensen repeatedly complains about the quality and duration of his sleep. He claims that he has difficulty falling asleep and staying asleep, and that he usually wakes up before it is time to get up.
Those rights that are so fundamental that they are outside of the authority of government to refulate are known as
Does the president of israel make all the decisions and rules for the country
In a speech to the British people, Churchill said the following: Let us brace ourselves to our duties and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men
Link Copied!