Register

Given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2 Prove: a ∥ b What is the missing reason in the proof? Corresponding angles are congruent. Converse of the Corresponding Angles Postulate Alternate interior angles…

Given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2 Prove: a ∥ b What is the missing reason in the proof? Corresponding angles are congruent. Converse of the Corresponding Angles Postulate Alternate interior angles…
144k views
1 vote
Given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2

Prove: a ∥ b
What is the missing reason in the proof?


Corresponding angles are congruent.


Converse of the Corresponding Angles Postulate


Alternate interior angles are congruent.


Transitive Property of Congruence

Given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2 Prove: a ∥ b What is the missing reason in the proof? Corresponding-example-1
Given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2 Prove: a ∥ b What is the missing reason in the proof? Corresponding-example-1
Given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2 Prove: a ∥ b What is the missing reason in the proof? Corresponding-example-2
User Dorky Engineer
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer: Its 'Transitive Property of Congruence'

Explanation:

User OAH
by
8.0k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

How do you can you solve this problem 37 + y = 87; y =
What is .725 as a fraction
How do you estimate of 4 5/8 X 1/3
Link Copied!