100k views
5 votes
In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ruled that:

O
A. Florida needed to end its recount of presidential votes.
O
B. the Electoral College could not decide a presidential election.
O
C. Florida had to give up its electoral votes in the next election.
O
D. no court had the power to influence a presidential election.

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.

User Rafael Zayas
by
6.2k points
1 vote

Answer:

A.Florida needed to end its recount of presidential votes.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Bush v. Gore decision the US supreme court settled the dispute of 2000 presidential election. The decision was given on December 13, 2000. It halted the Florida vote recount. The court rule that using different standards of counting in different counties was a violation of the equal protection clause and also that no alternative methods could be used within the time limit set by Title 3 of the USC (United states code). It also allowed the previous vote certification to stand and George W. Bush was announced the winner of the Florida's electoral votes.

User Ssv
by
6.6k points