Question

Select three (3) of the following that would be arguments of the Anti-Federalists. The Constitution gives too much power to the central government, overpowering the states. A strong President is necessary to protect the country against foreign attack and make sure laws are carried out properly. Nothing in the Constitution says the federal government has power to limit people's freedoms in the first place. The Constitution says that the federal laws are the 'supreme laws of the land', so the federal government could just take complete control. The Constitution is a Bill of Rights because it guarantees citizens a role in government. The Constitution contains no Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties like freedom of speech, trial by jury, and the right against searches and seizures.

Answer 1

The Anti-Federalists had three main arguments against the Constitution. Firstly, they believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, overpowering the states. Secondly, they objected to the absence of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties. Lastly, they were concerned that the federal government could take complete control as the Constitution declared federal laws as the 'supreme laws of the land'.

Step-by-step explanation:

A primary argument of the Anti-Federalists is that the Constitution gives too much power to the central government, overpowering the states. They believed that the strong central government would infringe on the rights of the states and undermine their ability to govern effectively. Another argument of the Anti-Federalists is that the Constitution contains no Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties like freedom of speech, trial by jury, and the right against searches and seizures. They insisted on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens. Finally, the Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution says that the federal laws are the 'supreme laws of the land', which could lead to the federal government taking complete control. They feared that this would erode the power and autonomy of the states.

Answer 2

The Constitution is a Bill of Rights because it guarantees citizens a role in government.

The Constitution gives too much power to the central government, overpowering the states.

Nothing in the Constitution says the federal government has power to limit people's freedoms in the first place.

Step-by-step explanation:

Anti-federalists defended idea of the Bill of ​​rights and minimal federal government interference in state affairs. They saw its purpose only in international activities. Unlike the federalists, they did not have a developed plan for organizing a new government. Among them, there were mostly farmers and small traders. The anti-federalist Patrick Henry is known for his many speeches about freedom and the dangers of creating a national government. Anti-federalists opposed an authoritarian national government, fearing that it might take away their rights, including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.