Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Vincent graduated from college with a degree in horticulture and now owns a local plant nursery. He maintains a blog titled, "How to Live a Happy Life,” and writes that people can lead happier lives by varying the routes they usually take home from work. Which statement best evaluates this claim? A. This claim is scientific because it is based on Vincent’s personal experience. B. This claim is scientific because other people have taken his advice and are now happier. C. This claim may not be accurate because the blog is produced by someone who is not an expert in the field of human psychology. D. This claim may not be accurate because most people follow the same route home."
Answer:
C. This claim may not be accurate because the blog is produced by someone who is not an expert in the field of human psychology.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we know, Vicent is a horticulturist and not a psychologist. The texts of his blog aim to help people to be happier, however, Vicent has no academic training, to give advice that has a scientific basis and that can really help people to reach higher levels of happiness. Vicente, writes the texts based on his concept of happiness, which can be efficient in other people's lives, but can contain inaccurate, incorrect and inaccurate information.