Question

Some modern artists think that it’s not important any longer for a work of art to be ""about"" something—that what matters most is its visual impact. What do you think? Do you think that art should be ""about"" something in order to be meaningful? Or do you think the visuals are more important? Why?

Answer 1

Yes They are important

:

Answer 2

I personally think art can be what it is yeah sometimes you get inspired to do art and there's a story behind it but sometimes you just sit down and do it .When you might not see if something is about something someone else may see the meaning. Although visual are important it is really about how the artist and the interpreter feel about it .I believe this because beauty is in the eye of the beholder and saying this means everyone will see it differently

Step-by-step explanation: