Answer:
The correct answer is: Because they had insufficient external justification, children in the mild-threat condition experienced more dissonance and changed their rating of the forbidden toy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cognitive dissonance is all that thought that could generate conflict in people, either because the internal or external stimulus is not enough or because it finds another thought that makes presents this dissonance. Also, the dissonance has to do with the effects that it can have on the action.
Children who had a milder threat present more dissonance since the instructions could be more ambivalent for the children; in addition, the punishment will not be severe, so it is easy to create the dissonance.
On the other hand, the children who had a stronger threat did not present dissonance because they had more explicit instructions, and the punishment will be more severe, so it does not create dissonance.
I hope this information can help you.