Question

Keith Rollag (2007) noticed that coworkers evaluate and treat "new" employees differently from other staff members. He was interested in how long a new employee is considered "new" in an organization. He surveyed four organizations ranging in size from 34 to 89 employees. He found that the "new" employee status was mostly reserved for the 30% of employees in the organization with the lowest tenure. (a) In this study, what was the real range of employees hired by each organization surveyed?

Answer 1

Keith Rollag's study on the status of 'new' employees in organizations found that roughly 30% of the workforce, those with the lowest tenure, were considered 'new'. Real range of 'new' employees could vary from approximately 10 to 27 in the organizations surveyed, which had 34 to 89 employees.

Step-by-step explanation:

Keith Rollag's 2007 study focused on determining the duration of the 'new' employee status within various organizations. The size of the organizations ranged from 34 to 89 employees. According to his findings, employees who were in the bottom 30% in terms of tenure were generally considered 'new'.

To calculate the range of 'new' employees for each organization, we can apply the information given in Rollag's study. If we take into account that 'new' refers to the employees with the lowest tenure, and this is roughly 30% of the organization's workforce, we can derive the real range:

For an organization with 34 employees, 30% would be approximately 10 employees.

For an organization with 89 employees, 30% would be approximately 27 employees.

Therefore, according to Keith Rollag's findings, the range of employees considered 'new' could vary from around 10 to 27 across the surveyed organizations.

Understanding the perceived duration of the 'new' employee status is essential for both organizations and employees. It helps businesses develop effective onboarding programs and probationary policies and aids employees in navigating the organizational culture.