164k views
3 votes
Read this claim and counterargument

Claim: The benefits of exploring space justify the high
cost.
Counterargument: The money spent on exploring space
would do more good helping people here on Earth.
Which statement is the best response to this counterargument?

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

If we explore space, we'll learn more about science and be better able to help people here on Earth.

Step-by-step explanation:

The options you were given are the following:

  • People would rather invest money in something that will guarantee huge returns, such as space exploration.
  • We don't spend money wisely when we help people on Earth, so let's use that money for space instead.
  • If we explore space, we'll learn more about science and be better able to help people here on Earth.
  • We already spend enough money helping people here on Earth.

A result of scientific research are innovations. Investments made in science and technology pay off, as innovations may help humanity as a whole. Without innovations, the nation's development would stagnate, and the conditions people live in would additionally worsen. Problems would only grow. Many significant scientists had issues regarding finances, as people didn't believe they would benefit from their inventions. But, it turns out that we wouldn't be able to imagine life without many of these innovations, such as electricity. So, we can say that humanity can benefit from every improvement made in the field of science. That is why the third statement is the best response to the given counterargument.

User Kiee
by
7.7k points