Question

An undercover police officer has a recording device carried on his body and records an incriminating conversation between himself and an arsonist. No warrant authorizing this recording has been issued to the police officer. What is the likely ruling of the court regarding the use of this recording at trial?

Answer 1

Answer: The recording is admissible

Explanation: Call recording is used sometimes for the resolutions. In some cases people wants to use recorded conversations in court as a type of evidence.

For the recording be admissible it will have some different rules, for different places, and off course for different cases. There is no a rule that say is illegal, but it does not mean all of the recording are legal to use on the court.