Final answer:
After calculating total payments and considering the present value with the bank's annual interest rate, the Lockhart offer is better because the present value of the cost is lower than that of the Leander offer.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine which car deal is better, we must calculate the total cost of each option and consider the present value of the payments. The present value accounts for the time value of money, which reflects the premise that money available now is worth more than the same amount in the future due to its potential earning capacity. This is directly related to the concept of interest rates that the bank would provide for loans.
- Lockhart deal: $4,000 down payment plus 20 monthly payments of $750.
- Leander deal: $1,000 down payment plus 20 monthly payments of $850.
The total payments to Lockhart would be:
$4,000 + (20 × $750) = $19,000
The total payments to Leander would be:
$1,000 + (20 × $850) = $18,000
However, we must consider the present value of these payments. Assuming the local bank's annual interest rate is 12%, we can calculate that the present value cost of the Lockhart offer is actually less than the Leander offer's present value cost, despite the higher total payments, making the Lockhart offer the better deal.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
b. The Lockhart offer is better because the cost in terms of present value is less than the present value cost of the Leander offer.