227k views
3 votes
One of the steps Rob used to solve an equation is shown below.

-5(3x + 7) = 10

-15x + -35 = 10

A:Rob added -5 and 3x to eliminate the parentheses. This procedure is justified by the associative property.

B:Rob added -5 and 3x to eliminate the parentheses. This procedure is justified by the distributive property.

C:Rob multiplied 3x and 7 by -5 to eliminate the parentheses. This procedure is justified by the associative property.

D:Rob multiplied 3x and 7 by -5 to eliminate the parentheses. This procedure is justified by the distributive property.

User Marconius
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Let's review the distributive property.

It is

a(b+c) = ab + ac

Whenever we have a sum/difference multiplied by a number upfront, we need to eliminate the parenthesis. We do it by multiplying the constant with the terms of the sum/difference inside the parenthesis, each respectively.

Looking at 2 steps, we see Rob:

  • eliminated the parenthesis by multiplying -5 with both "3x" and "+7"
  • used the distributive property

From the answer choices, D is right.

User Ana Ban
by
7.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories