Answer:
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was just one part of a broader debate on slavery in the United States and the events leading up to the American Civil War. Its main purpose was to identify which new states could initiate slavery and which could not.
Step-by-step explanation:
Shopping in Louisiana nearly doubled the size of early America. This land acquisition provided space for settlers and enormous economic opportunities in agriculture and raw materials. The new country also sparked much debate among Congress over what would be allowed in any new state that would join the Union, especially the institution of slavery.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was very important for various reasons. The compromise itself resolved, for the time being, the dispute over where slavery should and could exist in recently acquired Louisiana territory. He urged that slavery did not exist above the 36 ° 30 'longitude. The exception was Missouri, which entered the Union in 1820 as a slave state under compromise. In addition to Missouri, Maine also entered the Union as a free state (formerly part of Massachusetts) to balance the number of free and slave states in the nation. This seeks to achieve equality of slaves and free states, along with a balance in Congress.
Other questions soon came up. Many questioned the ability of Congress to determine where slave and free states should exist. Some have argued that newly created states should have the freedom to choose how their country will enter the Union. Politicians and citizens, on the other hand, argued that slavery should not be allowed to expand completely into new territory. Nonetheless, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would remain law until it was denied by the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. Still, the compromise itself is crucial to understanding the evolving and highly debated topic of slavery in the United States, including its spread, the balance of free and slave states, and the entire institution itself.