220k views
5 votes
"The Crusader states were able to cling to survival only through frequent delivery of supplies and manpower from Europe. [They] were defended primarily by three semi-monastic military orders: the Templars, the Hospitallers, and the Teutonic Knights. Combining monasticism and militarism, these orders served to protect pilgrims and to wage perpetual war against the Muslims." "Whenever I visited Jerusalem, I always entered the al-Aqsa Mosque, beside which stood a small mosque which the Franks had converted into a church ... [T]he Templars, ... who were my friends, would evacuate the little adjoining mosque so that I could pray in it." The second passage does not support the first passage because the second passage

(a) Shows that an influx of manpower from Europe was not critical for the survival of the Crusader states
(b) Shows that Muslims vastly outnumbered Europeans in the Crusader states
(c) Minimizes the importance of Hospitallers and Teutonic Knights in the administration of the Crusader states
(d) Presents an incident in which a military order supported a Muslim traveler

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

(d) Presents an incident in which a military order supported a Muslim traveler

Step-by-step explanation:

The first paragraph portrait that the military orders were implacable and intolerant with the Muslim population, but as the second passage tells, there was also an influx of knowledge and tolerance between the Muslim and the members of the orders. This was seen especially with the Templars, who used this to gain knowledge in fields such as architecture, mathematics, and philosophy.

User Reveka
by
5.2k points