12.5k views
10 votes
What is the missing reason for line 3 in this proof? LZM

User Ivarg
by
8.0k points

2 Answers

5 votes

I have no idea what you mean!!!! Make it more clear next time. ;)

User Memen
by
8.6k points
6 votes

Answer: B. substitution property of =

Step-by-step explanation:

The given points, LM, LZ, and MZ, were substituted for their numbers.

Bonus:

Line 5- C. division property of =

Line 8- D. multiplication of real numbers

Line 2- D. segment addition postulate

I hope this helped!

Good luck <3

User Supasate
by
8.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories