Question

Question 5 of 20

2 Points
How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Katz v. United States?
O
A. It required police to inform suspects of their rights.
O
B. It expanded citizens' freedom of speech during a time of war.
O
C. It protected some forms of symbolic speech used by students in
public schools.
O
D. It expanded the right to privacy to include situations in which a
person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Answer 1

In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court expanded privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment, ruling that a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy against electronic eavesdropping, thus extending protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court reinterpreted civil liberties in the case of Katz v. United States by recognizing the right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment as protecting people rather than just protecting areas against physical intrusion. In Katz v. United States, Charles Katz was convicted for illegal gambling after the FBI recorded his conversations from a public phone booth without a warrant. The Supreme Court ruled that Katz was entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy and, therefore, the FBI's actions violated the Fourth Amendment. Hence, the correct answer to how did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Katz v. United States is:

D. It expanded the right to privacy to include situations in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

This landmark decision extended constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures to cover electronic eavesdropping and set a precedent for privacy rights that continues to influence issues related to surveillance and data collection.

Answer 2

I’m going to say B I could be wrong