59.7k views
10 votes
In a fit of anger a wealthy acquaintance of yours throws a bat at your car the bat bounces off the side of the car and hits you in the face your friend Bill tells you that it won't do you any good to report it to the police "even if they prosecute her you can't get anything as a result" is your friend correct?

User Basant
by
5.8k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

No, your friend is not correct. The incident where a bat was thrown at your car and hit you can result in criminal charges and the possibility of a civil suit for damages and compensation. John Adams emphasized that irrespective of personal affections, the factual events hold legal consequences.

Step-by-step explanation:

Contrary to your friend's belief, reporting the incident wherein a bat was thrown at your car and subsequently hit you can indeed result in consequences for the perpetrator. In legal terms, this scenario could constitute both criminal and civil issues. The act of throwing the bat could be considered assault or criminal damage, depending on jurisdiction, and reporting the incident to the police could lead to criminal charges. Additionally, you could pursue a civil case for any injuries or damages incurred, seeking compensation.

Newton's third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, is an underlying principle recognized in both physics and legal situations like the one described. The law metaphorically applies this principle; the perpetrator's actions have legal consequences that can affect them negatively, as a reaction to the negative action they initiated.

John Adams' argument that 'facts are stubborn things' highlights that regardless of personal feelings or relationships, the factual basis of the action taken will determine the legal outcome. It suggests that personal biases should not obscure the legal process, and justice should be sought based on the facts of the scenario described.

User Joshua Rodgers
by
5.9k points