122k views
0 votes
"The Crusader states were able to cling to survival only through frequent delivery of supplies and manpower from Europe. [They] were defended primarily by three semi-monastic military orders: the Templars, the Hospitallers, and the Teutonic Knights. Combining monasticism and militarism, these orders served to protect pilgrims and to wage perpetual war againstthe Muslims." Palmira Brummett, world historian, 2007__________________________________________________________________"Whenever I visited Jerusalem, I always entered the al-Aqsa Mosque, beside which stood a small mosque which the Franks had converted into a church.... [T]he Templars, ... who were my friends, would evacuate the little adjoining mosque so that I could pray in it."Usamah ibn Munqidh, Muslim historian, Jerusalem, circa 1138-- The second passage does not support the first passage because the second passage...(A) shows that an influx of manpower from Europe was not critical for the survival of the Crusader states(B) shows that Muslims vastly outnumbered Europeans in the Crusader states(C) minimizes the importance of Hospitallers and Teutonic Knights in the administration of the Crusader states(D) presents an incident in which a military order supported a Muslim traveler

User Targumon
by
6.5k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

Option D: “Presents an incident in which a military order supported a Muslim traveler”. True.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the first paragraph, at the Crusades time Muslims were the principal enemy for Templars, Hospitallers and Knights alike. The second paragraph is a single, personal experience, very rare given that the protagonist is Muslim and only because he had friends within the Templars, he was allowed to pray according to his beliefs. Following the first paragraph, any other Muslim would not have had that special treatment the second writer had.

User Jchung
by
4.8k points