155k views
1 vote
A study that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. The researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. No additional changes are planned. Which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? The new research would need full review by a convened IRB because children are a protected population. The research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors. The research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population. Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.

User Tylon
by
5.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer: Unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.

Step-by-step explanation:

The review of a research proposal can be exempt for review, have an expedited review or a full review.

Expedited reviews are carried out at a meeting organized by the president of the association conducting the investigation. It is done whenever a minimum change is made to a previous research proposal and that this new proposal involves minors and vulnerable populations. It is also analyzed if it is standardized for the new group to be evaluated and does not contain content without ethics.

I hope this information can help you.

User Pbond
by
5.9k points