Question

Highlight ideas in this passage that show why the Anti-Federalists objected to the Constitution. If it were possible to consolidate the states, and preserve the features of a free government . . . [w]ealth, offices, and the benefits of government would collect in the center: and the extreme states . . . become much less important. . . . I still believe a complete federal bill of rights to be very practicable. Which reasons below explain why the Anti-Federalists objected to the Constitution? Check all that apply Power would be too centralized. A bill of rights was included. States would become less powerful. A bill of rights was not included. States would become more powerful.

Answer 1

Power would be too centralized.

States would become less powerful.

A bill of rights was not included

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

The ratification of anti-federalists was not supported in America, and this is because the Americans feared that the introduction of the new ruling system would have more power, and this may be caused threats to the citizens and other liberties.

The absence of the BOR is dangerous, and the federalists taught that adding it was not necessary because they lacked the knowledge of doing so, and the constitution was limited. However, they taught that the law had given them more power.