Question

In Louisiana v. Hamed, the Court analyzed whether the evidence was sufficient to find the elements of the crime of issuing worthless checks were proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Which element(s) did the court find lacking to prove criminal guilt in this case?

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

In Louisiana v. Hamed, the Court analyzed whether the evidence was sufficient to find the elements of the crime of issuing worthless checks were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

The use the knowledge element was lacking that was the main point on the court sentence. The evidence was legally insufficient to convict the defendant of issuing worthless checks. For that reason Court reversed the defendant's conviction and sentence.