Final answer:
John F. Kennedy's statement about what citizens can do for their country does not imply the abandonment of welfare and humanitarian aid programs. Kennedy's policies and the programs he established indicate his support for both public service and governmental aid.
Step-by-step explanation:
While John F. Kennedy did suggest in his inaugural address that Americans should think about what they can do for their country instead of what their country can do for them, this statement doesn't necessarily imply that welfare and humanitarian aid programs should be abandoned. Kennedy's administration was known for establishing programs such as the Peace Corps, the Alliance for Progress, and the Agency for International Development, which were created to support economic growth, social stability and humanitarian efforts both domestically and internationally. These initiatives indicate that, while Kennedy advocated for personal responsibility and public service, he also supported the role of government in providing aid and fostering welfare.
Argument A, which suggests that welfare and humanitarian aid programs should be abandoned based on Kennedy's statement, is a misinterpretation of his speech. Kennedy's broader policy agenda and his establishment of various aid programs demonstrate a commitment to both encouraging individual contribution to society and sustaining government support for those in need.