Register
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:
11.5k views
3 votes
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

User Trembon
by
8.1k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:not

synthesized

Step-by-step explanation:

User Stas Makarov
by
8.0k points
1 vote
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so it’s unreliable. It’s not scholarly or even protected by anyone to keep false info out
User Brejuro
by
7.9k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User JonatasTeixeira
asked Feb 18, 2022 23.0k views
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:
JonatasTeixeira asked Feb 18, 2022
by JonatasTeixeira
8.0k points
2 answers
24 votes
23.0k views
User Nat Mote
asked Jan 3, 2017 114k views
Scholarly research uses ____________. blogs wikipedia credible sources fictional accounts
Nat Mote asked Jan 3, 2017
by Nat Mote
8.2k points
2 answers
1 vote
114k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

Passe para a voz passiva: - Kevin asked Dennis a question -Somebody Build the house last year -She gives him a box
Who is the author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland'??
Transforme em voz passiva: They don't speak English in this shop
In which sentence is a common noun underlined? A. We went horseback riding in Griffith Park yesterday afternoon. B. It was so much fun dancing on the grass in Widley Park. C. We rode all the roller coasters
How many words can you make out of scotland
Link Copied!