Answer: We have that
and
but the minimum of S doesn't exist.
Step-by-step explanation: To find the supremum (or least upper bound) of a set, we first need to prove that an upper bound exists. So we must find a number
such that
for all
. Note that
for every
. Thus, for each
, we have that
. This proves that
is an upper bound for
. Since the set is bounded above, then we have that the supremum must exist. Notice that
which means 1 is the highest number in
. So we conclude that
.
Now to find the infimum, we must start by finding a lower bound for
. This will turn out to be quite easy as we just need to notice that if
then
. Now we have our lower bound! This means S is bounded below and thus its infimum exists. Let us claim that
. As per the definition of infimum, we need to prove that any other lower bound would be smaller than 0. This is not so simple so think of it this way: if we find a number greater than 0 that is also a lower bound for S, then 0 is not the greatest lower bound. Then we will set out to prove that any number greater than 0 is not a lower bound. Let us assume then that
. Then there is some
such that
. Since
, then
is not a lower bound for
. This shows that
. Recall that when a set has its infimum as an element, we call it minimum but since we've already proven that every element of S is strictly greater than 0, then the minimum of S doesn't exist.