21.4k views
2 votes
Let the set S be given by S = 1/n . Describe maximum, minimum, supremum (least upper bound), and infimum (greatest lower bound) for S (they may not exist).

User Chuck H
by
4.5k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer: We have that
max\{S\} = sup\{S\} = 1 and
inf\{S\}=0 but the minimum of S doesn't exist.

Step-by-step explanation: To find the supremum (or least upper bound) of a set, we first need to prove that an upper bound exists. So we must find a number
\alpha such that
\alpha \geq x for all
x \in S. Note that
1 \leq k for every
k \in \mathbb{N}. Thus, for each
k \in \mathbb{N}, we have that
(1)/(k) \leq 1. This proves that
1 is an upper bound for
S. Since the set is bounded above, then we have that the supremum must exist. Notice that
1 \in S which means 1 is the highest number in
S. So we conclude that
max\{S\} = sup\{S\} = 1.

Now to find the infimum, we must start by finding a lower bound for
S. This will turn out to be quite easy as we just need to notice that if
k \in \mathbb{N} then
(1)/(k) > 0. Now we have our lower bound! This means S is bounded below and thus its infimum exists. Let us claim that
inf\{S\}=0. As per the definition of infimum, we need to prove that any other lower bound would be smaller than 0. This is not so simple so think of it this way: if we find a number greater than 0 that is also a lower bound for S, then 0 is not the greatest lower bound. Then we will set out to prove that any number greater than 0 is not a lower bound. Let us assume then that
L > 0. Then there is some
n \in \mathbb{N} such that
(1)/(n) < L. Since
(1)/(n) \in S, then
L is not a lower bound for
S. This shows that
inf\{S\}=0. Recall that when a set has its infimum as an element, we call it minimum but since we've already proven that every element of S is strictly greater than 0, then the minimum of S doesn't exist.

User Johngull
by
5.1k points