Final answer:
Austin O'Malley's quote likens revenge to the illogical action of biting a dog that has bitten you, highlighting the futility and pettiness of such a response. Confucius's teachings and the biblical principle of "an eye for an eye" underline the importance of moral behavior and proportional justice over vindictive retaliation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The quote "Revenge is often like biting a dog because the dog bit you" by Austin O'Malley suggests that seeking revenge is an irrational and unproductive response to being wronged. The act of revenge can be likened to the absurdity of biting a dog in retaliation for it biting you; not only does this not solve the initial issue, but it also reduces one to acting on animalistic impulses, perpetuating a cycle of aggression.
In contrast, various philosophical quotes and teachings, such as those from Confucius, suggest a higher moral ground. For instance, Confucius stated, "He who acts with a constant view to his own advantage will be much murmured against," and "To see what is right and not to do it is want of courage, or of principle." These teachings imply that rather than acting on the base instinct of revenge, one should consider the consequences and strive for virtuous action. Similarly, the biblical principle of "an eye for an eye" is often misunderstood. It originally served as a limitation on retaliation, advocating for proportional justice, rather than perpetuating a cycle of escalating violence. Understanding the context of such teachings can offer insight into how systems of justice have evolved to prevent continuous vendettas and vengeance.