Question

Jack wanted an new iPad, but he did not want to spend the money he was saving for his ski trip. He then considered stealing one from a local bookstore where security was lax. Jack deliberated between the pros - new iPad and ski trip and the cons - getting caught for stealing the iPad. Given the slipshod security at the bookstore, Jack decides to steal an iPad. Of the following theories of crime and delinquency, which one best explains Jack's behavior?

Answer 1

Jack's decision to steal an iPad despite the risk of getting caught is best explained by rational choice theory, where he conducted a cost-benefit analysis and determined the benefits outweighed the risks.

Step-by-step explanation:

The behavior of Jack, who decides to steal an iPad weighing the cost-benefit analysis, can be best explained by rational choice theory. In this theory, individuals are assumed to make logical decisions that provide the greatest benefit to themselves, given the information available at the time. Jack assessed the opportunity cost of not having an iPad and going on a ski trip against the potential cost of getting caught and decided the rewards outweighed the risks. This calculation is a classic example of how individuals may engage in criminal behavior when they perceive the benefits to exceed the costs, a concept further illustrated by scenarios like tax evasion, where the perceived chances of avoidance of penalty weigh heavily on the decision to commit the crime.

Answer 2

Choice theory

Step-by-step explanation:

William Glasser has given the term choice theory.

Choice Theory: This is a psychological representation that describes why people act or behave as they do and how we can construct positive relationships with the one who are valuable to us.

Choice theory states behaviors we choose are principle to our existence.

Our behavior or choices are driven by:

1. Survival

2. Love and belonging

3. Freedom

4. Fun

5. Power

In criminology: The rational choice theory embrace a utilitarian faith that humans are reasoning actors who considers cost and benefits, means and ends, in order to make a logical choice. It was designed by Clarke and Cornish to help in thinking about circumstantial crime prevention.