Question

Which option is a benefit of implementing a client/server arrangement over a peer-to-peer arrangement?

(A) Client/server networks can easily scale, which might require the purchase of additional client lisences.

(B) Client/server networks can cost more than peer-to-peer network. for example, client/server network might require the purchase of dedicated server hardware and a network OS with an appropriate number of lisences.

(C) peer-to-peer network can be very difficult to install.

(D) peer-to-peer networks typically cost more than client/server networks because there is no requirement for dedicated server resources or advance NOS software.

Answer 1

Answer: (A) Client/server networks can easily scale, which might require the purchase of additional client licences.

Step-by-step explanation:

The client server model are easily scalable as it makes the system more efficient and has high ability to make the program for scale.

The Client /server local area networks (LANs) offer improved security for shared assets, more easily execution, expanded reinforcement effectiveness for system based information, and the potential for the utilization of excess power supplies and RAID drive exhibits.

A server is intended to share its assets among the customer PCs on the system. Commonly, servers are situated in verified zones, for example, bolted storage rooms or server farms (server rooms), since they hold an association's most profitable information and don't need to be gotten to by administrators consistently.