Answer:
The historian's interpretation should not be biased as it is the social and ethical responsibility of a historian to produce scientific and unbiased facts to the reader. A historian has to be neutral or his work would be considered unreliable. The partiality in the work of the historian is not only misleading to the reader but it also shows the degradation of history as something to look upon.
Step-by-step explanation:
A historian's interpretation of events should never be biased so as not to mislead people on the past events.
5.7m questions
7.4m answers