154k views
3 votes
Arthur fired a gun in the middle of the desert. He intended to fire the gun, but had no reason to believe anyone else was in the area. The bullet hit Bob, who happened to be riding his ATV across the desert. In this case:a.Arthur has committed the tort of assault.b.Arthur has committed the tort of battery.c.It is unlikely that Arthur has the necessary intent to commit a tort.d.Arthur has committed the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress.

User Pdoak
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

c. It is unlikely that Arthur has the necessary intent to commit a tort.

Step-by-step explanation:

  • This is because for someone to commit a tort, then, the act must be intentional, i.e, the actor acts with the knowledge that he or she is going to cause harm.
  • In the above case, Arthur did not intend to harm Bob. He fired the gun assuming that, it was a forest and therefore, no one was around.
  • Accidentally, Bob happened to be at the point of aim of the gut and got shot.
User Dragos Stoica
by
8.0k points

Related questions

asked Jun 28, 2024 190k views
Josh Brown asked Jun 28, 2024
by Josh Brown
8.5k points
1 answer
1 vote
190k views
1 answer
2 votes
227k views
asked Mar 19, 2024 218k views
Jorj McKie asked Mar 19, 2024
by Jorj McKie
8.5k points
1 answer
2 votes
218k views