Answer:
![- (2[1 - x])/(3) = g[f(x)] \\ \\ (3x)/(2 - x) = f[g(x)]](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/high-school/r0pqk01z4izmpphrcjnjimn50o9b63ddsy.png)
Explanation:
They are not.
For the g[f(x)] function, you substitute ³/ₓ ₋ ₁ from the f(x) function in for x in the g(x) function to get this:

Then, you bring x - 1 to the top while changing the expression to its conjugate [same expressions with opposite symbols]:
![- (2[1 - x])/(3)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/high-school/79zuvtu7nspa8f8rcu4sju47sgm0h0cu54.png)
You could also do this [attaching another negative would make that positive].
For the f[g(x)] function, ²/ₓ from the g(x) function for x in the f(x) function to get this:

Now, if you look closely, ²/ₓ is written as 2x⁻¹, and according to the Negative Exponential Rule, you bring the denominator to the numerator while ALTERING THE INTEGER SYMBOL FROM NEGATIVE TO POSITIVE:

When this happens, x leaves the two and gets attached to the three, and 1 gets an x attached to it.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.