Question

5. Returning to the island scenario, imagine a leader emerges. His rule brings

order and stability, but he also demands total obedience from his subjects and

severely restricts their freedom. How might Hobbes's perspective on the

government he established differ from Locke's?

Answer 1

Hobbes believed in a strong and forceful leader, while Locke believed in a government controlled by the people.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hobbes and Locke had different perspectives on the type of government that should be established.

Hobbes believed that a strong and forceful leader, such as a monarchy, was necessary to maintain order and prevent chaos. He argued that people should give up their freedoms and obey the government in order to protect themselves and serve their best interests.

On the other hand, Locke believed that the role of government was to protect the individual rights of the people. He believed that governments exist to serve the needs of the people and should be controlled by the people. Locke argued that individuals should be in charge of their own government, and leaders should listen to and follow the will of the people.

Answer 2

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two great Enlightenment thinkers that influenced political philosophy. One difference between these two philosophers is that John Locke believed that in order to live in a healthier society, people had to transfer some of their rights to a limited government in a "Social Contract." Under this contract, the government had to be elected and changed by the people whenever they deemed it necessary, and it also had to protect people's right to life, freedom, and property.

Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, believed in establishing a social contract and promoted the idea that all individuals had to cede their natural rights to an absolute government in order to live in a better and orderly society, even meaning that people had to accept abuses (The island scenario illustrates Hobbes' ideas).