![\displaystyle\lim_(x\to-2^+)(x-1)/(x^2(x+2))](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/yukpss78kglz3pi516km3bmi7jv1kolf4q.png)
The limit is infinite because the denominator approaches 0 while the numerator does not, since
when
. Which infinity it approaches (positive or negative) depends on the sign of the other terms for values of
near -2.
Since
from the right, we're considering values of
. For example, if
, then
; if
, then
, and so on. We can keep picking values of
that get closer and closer to -2, and we would see that
contributes a negative sign every time. So the limit must be
.
![\displaystyle\lim_(x\to0)(x-1)/(x^2(x+2))](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/vsar54gebi4j6njoqecw19k4al8fmtmdi8.png)
By similar reasoning above, we see that
contributes a negative sign regardless of which side we approach 0 from.
is always negative and
is always positive, so the net effect is a negative sign and the limit from either side is
.
![\displaystyle\lim_(x\to2\pi)x\csc x=\lim_(x\to2\pi)\frac x{\sin x}](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/ffxlc6sx0iwrlhlncfopnotnw0dxm4wvgy.png)
Direct substitution gives 0 in the denominator. For
we have
, and for
we have
. Meanwhile, the numerator stays positive, which means the limit is positive or negative infinity depending on the direction in which
approaches
, so this limit does not exist.