26.7k views
5 votes
Counter-argument: Buying laptops for all students would

stretch the budgets of already underfunded schools.
Which of the following responds to the counter-argument by conceding to it?
A. Providing laptops to students will help them organize their tasks
and do homework more efficiently.
O
B. Unless schools provide laptops to students, graduates will be
behind technologically when they apply to college.
O
C. It's true that laptops are expensive, but the benefits they provide
for student learning far outweigh any initial costs.
O
D. Laptops and other electronic equipment are an integral part of
students' lives already, and schools need to catch up.

User Fireitup
by
5.1k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

This argument makes you think about the welfare and future of the student, and schools are supposed to prepare you for the future. With this reasoning, there aren't too many counter-arguments to this.

User Nathaniel Jones
by
5.5k points
4 votes

Answer:

C. It's true that laptops are expensive, but the benefits they providefor students learning far outweigh any initial cost.

Step-by-step explanation:

This makes us to understand that though buying a laptop might be over bearing, but it can not be compared to its importance and benefits to students, especially in this technologically driven society of ours.

User Alec Sanger
by
5.0k points