Question

Before attempting to demonstrate their abilities, astrologists often try to explain away inaccurate predictions. Such excuses violate the critical thinking principle of __________.

a. falsifiability.b. skepticism.c. Occam's Razor.d. replicability.

Answer 1

a. falsifiability

Explanation:

Falsifiability is an essential component of research methodology. Falsifiability is a capacity to be proven wrong for some preposition, statements, and theory. In research, it can be synonymous with testability. the requirement for Falsifiability is that the conclusion could not be drawn for a particular phenomenon.

we can understand it by a simple example:

Suppose if a person seeing a white swan in his lifetime and never know about a black swan or nonwhite swan, he might believe that there is only a white swan. In falsifiability, it is not necessary to know that there re all-white swan but simply to understand that all swans are white.

Karl popper an Austrian philosopher and a scientist introduced this concept Falsifiability in the demarcation of separation in between science and pseudoscience.