66.3k views
2 votes
X

Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported
by a source
A Asource that historians trust is likely to have true opinions
B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias
C. Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
D. The opinions will reveal the identity of the source

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias

Step-by-step explanation:

goodluck

User Puhlze
by
5.1k points
4 votes

B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias

Step-by-step explanation:

History helps to unravel the past so as to better understand the present and predict the future to a logical extent.

The primary sources usually gives the eye witness account about an event. The information here is usually original and raw in terms of quality. Some examples are reports of experiments, records, etc. Most facts are usually drawn from primary sources.

Secondary sources are second hand information about an incidence. Most news reports and newspaper accounts are secondary sources of information. They represents opinions about a happening.

Opinions gives investigative and thoughtful perspective about most primary sources of historical data. They provide a keen thought about possible bias and feelings of the actual description of the original evidence.

User BlameTheBits
by
5.5k points