39.6k views
7 votes
Amy Tan compares tofu to stacked wedges of rubbery white sponges. How does this description make the reader feel about the tofu?

The reader has a hard time picturing tofu that looks like a sponge.
The tofu does not seem like something that should be eaten.
The reader must decide whether tofu is a tasty food or a disgusting food.
The tofu must be useful for more than just eating.

User Azimuth
by
5.3k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Final answer:

Amy Tan's description of tofu as rubbery white sponges likely conveys an unappetizing impression, emphasizing the cultural differences in food perception and potential digestive upsets when encountering unfamiliar diets.

Step-by-step explanation:

Amy Tan's comparison of tofu to stacked wedges of rubbery white sponges likely makes the reader think that the tofu does not seem like something that should be eaten. It evokes a visual and tactile image that is more commonly associated with a non-food item, suggesting an unappetizing nature. The choice of words such as “rubbery” and “sponges” can make the tofu appear unpleasant to eat, as these terms are typically not used to describe food in a positive way.

Furthermore, the cultural context mentioned in the provided information suggests that food perceptions can vary greatly across different societies. Amy Tan's description may contrast with other cultures' views of tofu as a staple and delicacy. This also relates to the idea that when people move to different regions or countries, they might have temporary digestive upsets due to unfamiliar diets, which include not only different foods but also the ways in which those foods are described and perceived.

User Andrepm
by
5.0k points
1 vote

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

If she is comparing it to rubbery whit sponges then she obviously doesn't think it is something that should be eaten.

User Evgeny Soynov
by
5.3k points