85.5k views
4 votes
Conclusions based on flawed data that does not answer a testable question is an example of......A} an inference B) a scientific explanation C) pseudoscience D) science

User Tris Timb
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Option C, pseudoscience

Step-by-step explanation:

When a fact has no logical or scientific backing to support its existence and is considered true only on the basis of beliefs prevailing in any society since ages. For example - spiritual science , horoscope, palm reading, tarot card, existence of God etc.

Thus, any flawed data that cannot be tested comes under the category of pseudoscience.

Hence, option C is correct

User Cleptus
by
8.3k points