1.2k views
0 votes
L :V --> W is a linear transformation. Prove each of the following (a) ker L is a subspace of V. (b) range L is a subspace of W.

User Ccastillop
by
5.5k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

a) Assume that
x,y\in\ker L, and
\alpha is a scalar (a real or complex number).

First. Let us prove that
\ker L is not empty. This is easy because
L(0_V)=0_W, by linearity. Here,
0_V stands for the zero vector of V, and
0_W stands for the zero vector of W.

Second. Let us prove that
\alpha x\in\ker L. By linearity


L(\alpha x) = \alpha L(x)=\alpha 0_W=0_W.

Then,
\alpha x\in\ker L.

Third. Let us prove that
y+ x\in\ker L. Again, by linearity


L(x+y)=L(x)+L(y) = 0_W + 0_W=0_W.

And the statement readily follows.

b) Assume that
u and
v are in range of
L. Then, there exist
x,y\in V such that
L(x)=u and
L(y)=v.

First. Let us prove that range of
L is not empty. This is easy because
L(0_V)=0_W, by linearity.

Second. Let us prove that
\alpha u is on the range of
L.


\alpha u = \alpha L(x) = L(\alpha x) = L(z).

Then, there exist an element
z\in V such that
L(z)=\alpha u. Thus
\alpha u is in the range of
L.

Third. Let us prove that
u+v is in the range of
L.


u+v = L(x)+L(y) = L(x+y)=L(z).

Then, there exist an element
z\in V such that
L(z)= u +v. Thus
u +v is in the range of
L.

Notice that in this second part of the problem we used the linearity in the reverse order, compared with the first part of the exercise.

Explanation:

User Paras
by
5.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.