Question

Read the excerpt from the TED Talks presentation “I Am the Son of a Terrorist.”

For the victims of terrorism, I will speak out against these senseless acts and condemn my father’s actions. And with that simple fact, I stand here as proof that violence isn’t inherent in one’s religion or race, and the son does not have to follow the ways of his father. I am not my father.
Which options best analyze how Zak Ebrahim uses diction to convey a point?

*******(Select all that apply.) *********

A- With words like “victims,” “senseless,” and “condemn,” Ebrahim reminds the audience that although he was raised with terrorists, he now sympathizes with the victims of terrorism.

B-With words like “religion,” “race,” and “father,” Ebrahim points out that people cannot control where they are born and what beliefs they are brought up with.

C- With words like “fact,” “proof,” and “inherent,” Ebrahim highlights the logic in his argument that, based on his own example, it must be possible to rehabilitate young men raised by terrorists

D-With words like “violence,” “acts,” and “ways,” Ebrahim expresses a perspective that our actions are predetermined by the life and situation we are born into

Answer 1

Answer: a, b and c

Step-by-step explanation:

A, B and C apply to how Mr Ebrahim uses diction to convey his point.The only option that does not apply is D-“With words like “violence,” “acts,” and “ways,” Ebrahim expresses a perspective that our actions are predetermined by the life and situation we are born into”

Because Mr Ebrahim is trying to convey exactly the opposite idea to what is expressed here: Our actions are not at all predetermined by any circumstance under which we were born.